Thank you for visiting this site. This article covers the “Bootstrap Paradox (the Causal Loop Paradox).”
It is one of the two great time-travel paradoxes alongside the Grandfather Paradox. Unlike the other, this one involves no logical contradiction — the unsettling core is that the information or object in question has no origin at all.
Because there is no contradiction, it is all the more eerie. This paradox shakes the very foundation of how humans think about causality.
A Concrete Example
Suppose you are a huge fan of a novelist. One day you obtain a time machine and travel back to when that novelist was young and had written nothing yet.
You hand the young novelist the manuscript of their future masterpiece — a book that has already been published in your era. The novelist reads it and publishes it as their own work. The book becomes a massive hit, is read through the decades into your time, you become a devoted fan, travel back in the time machine, and the loop begins again.
Here is the question: Who wrote this novel?
The manuscript you handed over is a copy of a book published in the future. But that book was published by the young novelist based on the manuscript they received from you. There is simply no “original author” anywhere.
The novel exists inside a causal loop, present in the world yet written by nobody.
The Physical Object Bootstrap
The same paradox applies not only to information but to physical objects.
Suppose your future self travels back and hands your past self a time machine. Your past self uses it, grows older, eventually travels back in time with the machine, and hands it to your younger self. “When was this time machine built?” — the answer is “it was never built.”
A physical object bootstrap raises an even deeper problem than an information one. Physical objects deteriorate over time. The time machine should wear down with each loop, yet an object that has completed infinite loops and is still functioning is deeply unnatural.
Information — a novel’s story, a melody — is abstract and does not degrade in principle. However, the medium that carries it (paper, hard drive) is physical and still subject to decay.
The Origin of the Name
“Bootstrap” comes from the English idiom of “pulling oneself up by one’s own bootstraps” — an impossible act of lifting yourself by gripping your own shoelaces. It is a metaphor for producing yourself from yourself as your own cause.
Incidentally, the computer “boot” (startup) also comes from this word. A computer needs a program to start, but the computer must already be running to read a program. The tiny program that resolves this chicken-and-egg problem is called the “bootstrap.”
How It Differs from the Grandfather Paradox
In the Grandfather Paradox, a logical contradiction arises: kill your grandfather → you disappear → you can’t kill him → you’re born → you kill him … an irresolvable loop.
In the Bootstrap Paradox, by contrast, no logical contradiction occurs. The causal loop is self-consistent: the novel exists, the loop runs stably, and nothing breaks.
The problem is not contradiction but the philosophical discomfort of “information with no origin.” Causality holds that “every effect has a cause,” yet in the Bootstrap Paradox a causeless effect exists.
This distinction matters. The Grandfather Paradox is often used to argue that time travel is impossible. The Bootstrap Paradox does not prove impossibility. Logically permissible, yet philosophically unsettling — that is the Bootstrap Paradox’s unique position.
Depictions in Science Fiction
The Bootstrap Paradox is a theme that has appeared repeatedly in science fiction.
Robert A. Heinlein’s short story By His Bootstraps (1941) is one of the earliest SF works to treat the paradox seriously. The protagonist becomes entangled in a complex loop that connects his own past and future.
In Back to the Future, Marty performs “Johnny B. Goode” at the 1955school dance; Chuck Berry’s cousin calls Chuck and holds the phone up so he can hear it. In this case, who composed “Johnny B. Goode”? Chuck Berry heard the song from Marty and composed it; Marty remembered the song and performed it in the past — a perfect bootstrap.
What Physics Says
General relativity shows that, in theory, spacetime structures called “closed timelike curves (CTCs)” — paths that loop back into the past — can exist. In a spacetime with CTCs, causal loops like the Bootstrap Paradox are theoretically possible.
The Novikov self-consistency principle holds that even if CTCs exist, no contradiction arises, and “contradiction-free loops” such as the Bootstrap Paradox are permissible.
However, whether information arising from nothing is consistent with entropy (the second law of thermodynamics) remains an open question. The second law says the entropy (disorder) of the universe always increases. Information is order itself, so information that exists without an origin seems to violate the law of entropy.
No definitive answer has yet been found. Whether time travel itself is physically possible is also unresolved; if it is impossible, the problem never arises.
Summary
This article covered the “Bootstrap Paradox.”
No logical contradiction — yet intuitively something feels deeply wrong. Information or objects with no origin, perpetually existing inside a causal loop, give us an intense sense of the strangeness of time.
“Every effect has a cause” is one of the most fundamental frameworks through which humans understand the world. The Bootstrap Paradox — which confronts us with the possibility that this breaks down — is one of the most captivating problems at the intersection of philosophy and physics.
To return to the full list of paradoxes, follow the link below.
Thank you for reading. We hope to see you in the next article.
